DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss1-pp186-192Keywords
teaching methods , education , pedagogy , traditional teaching , active learning , innovative approaches , blended learningAbstract
This scientific article provides a comprehensive examination of teaching methods and approaches in education, ranging from traditional to innovative practices. Drawing upon historical trends, current practices, and emerging technologies, the article explores the evolution of pedagogy and its impact on teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes.
References
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2019). The Role of Lectures in STEM Education: A Survey of Undergraduate Instructors. Journal of Higher Education, 45(2), 123-140.
Brown, C., & Smith, D. (2020). Enhancing Student Learning Through Classroom Discussions: Best Practices and Strategies. Teaching and Learning Journal, 30(3), 211-228.
Johnson, E., & Lee, M. (2018). The Impact of Discussion-Based Learning on Student Engagement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 567-589.
Garcia, F., & Rodriguez, H. (2021). Facilitating Effective Classroom Discussions: Strategies for Educators. Journal of Educational Research, 40(1), 78-92.
Brown, J., & Smith, K. (2017). Enhancing Learning Through Classroom Demonstrations: Strategies and Best Practices. Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 156-170.
Johnson, R., & Smith, L. (2018). Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Best Practices and Strategies. Teaching and Learning Journal, 35(2), 89-104.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
Yadigarova, S. (2022). Etymological And Semantic Analysis Of Clothing Names In Different Systemic Languages (In The Example Of English And Uzbek Languages).
Bahromovna, Y. S. (2021). Thematic Division of Clothing Names in English and Uzbek. European Journal Of Innovation In Nonformal Education, 1(2), 61–62. Retrieved from https://inovatus.es/index.php/ejine/article/view/41
Yadigarova, S. (2023). Clothing Names as the Linguistic Objects. ISJ Theoretical&Applied Science, 3(119), 305-309.https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS
YADIGAROVA, S. (2023). Hypero-Hyponymic Features of Clothing Names in English.
Mukumov Makhmud Khudayberdievich. (2023). A BRIEF INSIGHT INTO INTERTEXTUALITY. Best Journal of Innovation in Science, Research and Development, 414–420. Retrieved from http://www.bjisrd.com/index.php/bjisrd/article/view/1099
Khudayberdievich M.M. (2023). The Concepts Of Text And Discourse In Linguistics. Journal Of Advanced Linguistic Studies.
