Oliy ta'lim kontekstida clil va non-clil dasturlarining yozma vakolatlarini tahlil qilish va tushunish

  • ingliz tili o'qituvchisi, Yedju texnika instituti, Toshkent, O'zbekiston

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss6/S-pp56-61

Kalit so‘zlar

yozma kompetensiya , м , ravonlik , aniqlik , leksik murakkablik , grammatik murakkablik , bilim qobiliyatlari

Annotasiya

2020 yilda Toshkentdagi Yeoju texnika institutida yangi fakultet ochildi. Ushbu fakultet O'zbekistonda birinchi bo'lib talabalarga predmet va tillarni integratsiyalashgan o'qitishning ikki yo'naltirilgan yondashuvini (CLIL) o'rgatmoqda. Tadqiqotlar bir o'quv yili davomida (2 semestr) eksperimental va nazorat guruhlarida o'tkazildi, ular tarkibiga CLIL tillarini o'rganadigan va CLILni yaxshi bilmaydigan talabalar kiritildi. Tanlangan modul CLIL va CLIL bo'lmagan talabalarning yozma ko'nikmalarini uchta parametr bilan taqqoslaydigan akademik yozuvga kirish edi: ravonlik, aniqlik va akademik yozuvning murakkabligi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko'rsatdiki, CLIL guruhi CLIL-da o'qimagan talabalar bilan taqqoslaganda, akademik so'z birikmalaridan tez-tez foydalanish, yozma tarkibning murakkabligi va mazmuni bilan bog'liq bo'lib, ushbu mavzularga nisbatan ko'proq tanqidiy yondashuvni namoyish etdi.

Ko'chirildi

Kuchirilganligi haqida ma'lumot yuk.

Bibliografik manbalar

Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning at School in Europe. Eurydice European Unit

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bulté, B., &Housen, A. (2014): «Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity», Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 42–65.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English, Applied Linguistics 27(4): 590-619.

Lorenzo, F. (2007). An analytical framework of language integration in L2 content-based courses. Language and Education 21: 503–13.

Lorenzo, F., Casal, S. Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: key findings from the Andalusian sections evaluation report. Applied Linguistics, 31, 418-442.

Navés, T., &Victori, M. (2010). CLIL in Catalonia: An Overview of Research Studies,in David Lasagabaster and Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation,Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 30-54.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 385-395.

Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, Sh., & Kim, H. (1998): Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Hawai’i: University ofHawai’i at Manoa.

Yuklashlar

188 165

Nashr qilingan

Oliy ta'lim kontekstida clil va non-clil dasturlarining yozma vakolatlarini tahlil qilish va tushunish

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Uralova, N. . (2021). Oliy ta’lim kontekstida clil va non-clil dasturlarining yozma vakolatlarini tahlil qilish va tushunish. Jamiyat Va Innovatsiyalar, 2(6/S), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss6/S-pp56-61