Цифровые доказательства в уголовном процессе: вызовы, судебная практика и перспективы реформирования

Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). (2012). ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence.

Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). (2012). ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence. (Дополненное издание).

Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018).

Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

Casey, E., & Turnbull, B. (2014). Digital Evidence on Mobile Devices. Forensic Science International, 236, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.006

Cellebrite. (n.d.). Digital Intelligence Solutions. https://www.cellebrite.com/

Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No.185). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/185

ENFSI (European Network of Forensic Science Institutes). (2015). Guidelines for Best Practice in the Forensic Examination of Digital Technology.

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2013). Cyber Forensics – A Field Manual for Collecting, Handling and Analyzing Information and Evidence Related to Cybercrime. ENISA.

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2015). Tools and Methodologies to Support Cooperation with CERTs for Law Enforcement. ENISA.

Europol. (2020). First Responders Guide to Handling Electronic Evidence. https://www.europol.europa.eu

Europol. (2020). Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (IOCTA). https://www.europol.europa.eu

Ferguson, A. G. (2018). The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. NYU Press. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com

Henderson, S. E. (2015). Riley v. California: Carding a Path Out of the Cellar. SSRN-id2586464. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2586464

Kerr, O. S. (2014). Foreword: Accounting for Technological Change. Harvard Law Review, 36 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 403. Also available at SSRN: SSRN-id2628586. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2628586

Kerr, O. S. (2018). Carpenter v. United States and the Fourth Amendment: A Preliminary Analysis. Harvard Law Review Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.harvardlawreview.org/carpenter-v-united-states-and-the-fourth-amendment-a-preliminary-analysis/

Kerr, O. S. (2020). Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr. Harvard Law Review, 134, 905-970. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com

Kerr, O. S. (2020). Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data. Texas Tech Law Review. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3561285

Kshetri, N. (2019). Cybercrime and Cybersecurity in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan.

Magnet Forensics. (n.d.). Magnet AXIOM. https://www.magnetforensics.com

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2006). Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response (SP 800-86). U.S. Department of Commerce.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2014). Guidelines on Validating Forensic Tools and Methods (NISTIR 8006). U.S. Department of Commerce.

Popova, I. A. (2018). Improving the Use of Electronic Evidence in the Criminal Process: Legal Regulation and Practice. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law, 18(2), 239–243. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com

Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014).

Slobogin, C. (2015). Policing as Administration. William & Mary Law Review, 165(3), 865–886. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol165/iss3/5/

Solove, D. J. (2018). Carpenter v. United States and the Mosaic Theory. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2018-60. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3245527

Sommer, P., & Taylor, M. (2016). Digital Evidence, Digital Investigations and E-Disclosure: A Guide to Forensic Readiness. British Standards Institution.

Tokson, M. (2018). Carpenter and the Mosaic Theory. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 20(2), 540–560. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjolt/vol20/iss2/4

Tor Project. (n.d.). About. https://www.torproject.org/about/

U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties. https://www.justice.gov/criminal-mlats/

Wexler, R. (2020). Privacy as Privilege: Law Enforcement’s Breakable Shield. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3674899

Балашова, A. A. (2020). Электронные носители информации и их использование в уголовно-процессуальном доказывании. Москва: Академия управления МВД РФ.

Закон Республики Узбекистан «О персональных данных» (ЗРУ-547 от 2 июля 2019 г.). Доступно на: https://lex.uz

Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Республики Узбекистан. Доступно на: https://lex.uz