CLIL metodologiyasining sotsiolingvistik kompetensiyani rivojlantirishdagi o‘rni: xalqaro tajribalar tahlili (yurisprudensiya yo‘nalishi misolida)

Dilnoza Abduraxmonova

doi:10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss5-pp287-292

Dilnoza Abdurakhmonova PhD student, Namangan State University

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss5-pp287-292

Keywords

CLIL methodology , legal education , English language , sociolinguistic competence , intercultural communication

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical and linguodidactic foundations of using CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) technology in teaching English to Jurisprudence students. The study analyses the role of CLIL methodology in legal education, its significance in developing sociolinguistic competence, and the outcomes based on international practices. The findings suggest that CLIL enhances students’ abilities to acquire legal terminology in context, observe speech etiquette, and effectively engage in intercultural communication.

References

Alcaraz Varó E. Legal English. Pearson Education, 2010.

Bhatia V. K. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman, 1993.

Byram M. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1997.

Coyle D., Hood P., Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Crystal D. English as a Global Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Dalton-Puffer C. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007.

Hymes D. On Communicative Competence // Pride J. B., Holmes J. (Eds.). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972. Pp. 269–293.

Ikeda M. Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? Potential for the ‘weak’ version of CLIL // International CLIL Research Journal, 2013. Vol. 2, № 1. Pp. 31–43.

Lasagabaster D., Ruiz de Zarobe Y. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010.

Marsh D. CLIL/EMILE: The European Dimension – Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2002.

Mehdiyev A. Chet tillarni o‘qitishda zamonaviy pedagogik texnologiyalar. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Yozuvchilar uyushmasi nashriyoti, 2022.

Meyer O. Towards quality-CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies // Pulso, 2010. Vol. 33. Pp. 11–29.

Pavón V., Ellison M. Examining teacher roles and competencies in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) // Linguarum Arena, 2013. Vol. 4. Pp. 65–78.

Seikkula-Leino J. CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors // Language and Education, 2007. Vol. 21, № 4. Pp. 328–341.

Wolff D. The European framework for CLIL teacher education // International CLIL Research Journal, 2012. Vol. 1, № 2. Pp. 36–46.

Wilkinson R. English-medium instruction at a Dutch university: Challenges and pitfalls // Doiz A., Lasagabaster D., Sierra J. M. (Eds.). English-Medium Instruction at Universities: Global Challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013. Pp. 3–24.

Downloads

PDF (O'zbek)

4 3

Published

2025-09-15

The role of CLIL methodology in developing sociolinguistic competence: analysis of international experiences (on the example of Jurisprudence)

How to Cite

Abdurakhmonova, D. 2025. The role of CLIL methodology in developing sociolinguistic competence: analysis of international experiences (on the example of Jurisprudence). Foreign Linguistics and Lingvodidactics. 3, 5 (Sep. 2025), 287–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss5-pp287-292.