DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss7/S-pp259-278Keywords
electronic proof , digital proof , identification , authentication , image , hash functionAbstract
This article provides a scientific analysis of the concepts of electronic or digital evidence. In particular, issues related to the legal and technical characteristics of digital evidence, their collection, storage, verification, transportation and evaluation were investigated. At the same time, the problems and gaps in the practice of national legislation and law enforcement in the field of digital evidence processing are critically considered. Scientifically based ways and criteria for their elimination have been developed.
The article is prepared on the basis of scientific and practical research and opinions of theorists and practitioners conducted in the field of working with digital evidence, as well as technical research.
As a result of the conducted research, the methodological rules for working with digital evidence were analyzed. National legislation, investigative and judicial practice, international experience and practice were studied, and their achievements and shortcomings were justified in the author's conclusions. Based on this, the most optimal criteria for law enforcement entities to collect, verify and evaluate digital evidence were developed.
The article analyzes the problems in this area from a systematic, legal, scientific and methodological point of view and gives the author's conclusions on this issue. At the same time, issues related to ensuring the admissibility of digital evidence, their identification and authentication, verification and evaluation of expert opinions are also covered. Scientifically based proposals and recommendations have been developed for the legislator and the subjects applying it.
Downloads
References
Пирматов О.Ш. Иқтисодий ва фуқаролик суд ишларинини юритишда электрон далилларнинг процессуал жиҳатлари. юридик фанлари бўйича фалсафа доктори (PhD) диссертация. 2020 й. 1-155 Б.
Каdirovа М.К., Abdullaev R.К., Khujanazarov A.А., Rahimkulova L.U. Evaluation of the results of judicial computer and technical expertises by the investigators and the court. 2020. 74 С. DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260256. https://www.psychosocial.com/article/PR260256/13667/
Вехов В. Б. Электронная криминалистика: понятие и система // Криминалистика: актуальные вопросы теории и практики: сб. трудов участников меж-дунар. науч.-практич. конф. – Ростов н/Д., 2017. 44-60
Зуев С.В. Основы теории электронных доказательств: монография / под ред. докт. юрид. наук С.В. Зуева. М., 2019. С. 253-270.
Abdullaev R.К. The widespread use of electronic technology in criminal proceedings. Journal of LawResearch. 2020, 2 vol., issue 5, pp. 1-255
Пирматов О.Ш. Иқтисодий ва фуқаролик суд ишларинини юритишда электрон далилларнинг процессуал жиҳатлари // юридик фанлари бўйича фалсафа доктори (PhD) диссертация – Т.; ТДЮУ. 2020 й. 38 Б.Ўша жойда 38 – 39 Б.
Основы теории электронных доказательств: монография / под ред. докт. юрид. наук С.В. Зуева. – М.: Юрлитинформ, 2019. С. 253, 254.
Оконенко Р.И. «Электронные доказательства» и проблемы обеспечения прав граждан на защиту тайны личной жизни в уголовном процессе: сравнительный анализ законодательства Соединенных Штатов Америки и Российской Федерации : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. М., 2016
Пастухов П. С. О развитии уголовно-процессуального доказывания с использованием электронных доказательств // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
Khamidov B. Kh, Karimov B.Z., Topildieva D. M.. General Theoretical Issues of Improving Private Forensic Methods In The Field Of Combat Against Cybercrime. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2021) 58(1): 2705-2712. ISSN:00333077/ 2021. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1153
Джонс, Эндрю (2008). Создание лаборатории цифровой криминалистики . Баттерворт-Хайнеманн. п. 312. ISBN 978-1-85617-510-4. Цифровая криминалистика - https://ru.qaz.wiki/wiki/Digital_forensics
Sean E. Goodison, Robert C. Davis, and Brian A. Jackson. Digital Evidence and the U.S. Criminal Justice System - Identifying Technology and Other Needs to More Effectively Acquire and Utilize Digital Evidence. 2015.
Saferstein,Richard. A Simplified Guide To Digital Evidence. National Forensic Science Technology Center®NFSTC Largo, Florida 2015.
Casey, Eoghan (2004). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime, Second Edition. Elsevier. ISBN 0-12-163104-4.
Various (2009). Eoghan Casey (ed.). Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation. Academic Press. p. 567. ISBN 978-0-12-374267-4. Retrieved 2 September 2010.
Andre Arnes. “Digital Forensics”. Hoboken, Norway. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2018. – 7 p.
Каримов Бобуржон (2020). НАУЧНО-ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ВОПРОСЫ КАТЕГОРИИ ЦИФРОВЫХ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ. Review of law sciences, 5 (Спецвыпуск), 149-153. doi: 10.24412/2181-919X-2020-149-153
Xamidov B.X., Karimov B.Z.. Some issues in the development of the national cyber security strategy: problem and analysis. EUROPE, SCIENCE AND WE | EVROPA, VEDA A MY | ЕВРОПА, НАУКА И МЫ Education and Science, Czech Republic. 2020. 63 p.
Karen Kent, Suzanne Chevalier, Tim Grance, Hung Dang. Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response // Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Special Publication 800-86. 2006. E-1 p.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice. Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for First Responders, Second Edition. 2001. 38 p.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice. Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for First Responders, Second Edition. 2001. 49 p.
Черданцев А. Ю. Понятие цифровых доказательств, современное состояние и их роль в доказательственном процессе. Юридическая наука и практика. 2019. Том 15, № 4. C. 55–60. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0410-2019-15-4-55-60
Каримов Б.З. Рақамли далиллар категориясининг илмий-назарий масалалари. Илмий мақола – Т.: ТDYU Yuridik fanlar axborotnomasi – Вестник юридических наук – Review of Law Sciences. 5 (2020) 168 Б. (168-172 Б.).
INTERPOL Global guidelines for digital forensics laboratories. 2019. – P. 13-78.
ACPO Good Practice Guide for Computer-Based Electronic Evidence. Official release version 4.0. – P. 6-66.
https://skachat-besplatno.info/ximfiz/237-doimiy-elektr-toki-va-uning-1179onunlari.html
Ионова Ю.А., Калитин С.В. Понятие доказательств, имеющих электронную форму и цифровое содержание: проблемы и перспективы. Статья. Вестник ХГАЭП. 2013. № 1 (63) стр 53.
Хамидов Бахтиёр ОБЩЕТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ВОПРОСЫ СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ ЧАСТНЫХ КРИМИНАЛИСТИЧЕСКИХ МЕТОДОЛОГИЙ В СФЕРЕ БОРЬБЫ С КИБЕРПРЕСТУПНОСТЬЮ // Review of law sciences. 2020. №Спецвыпуск. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obscheteoreticheskie-voprosy-sovershenstvovaniya-chastnyh-kriminalisticheskih-metodologiy-v-sfere-borby-s-kiberprestupnostyu (дата обращения: 11.03.2021).
SWGDE Best Practices for Image Authentication, 2018; SWGDE Best Practices for Image Content Analysis, 2017; SWGDE Guidelines for Forensic Image Analysis, 2017. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/ru/cybercrime/module-6/key-issues/handling-of-digital-evidence.html
Karimov B.Z. Jinoyat ishlari bo’yicha raqamli kriminalistika imkoniyatlaridan foydalanish. Monografiya.- T., 2021.- 38 Б.
http://www.forensicmall.ru/cat/magnet-forensics/magnet-axiom/
http://www.forensicmall.ru/cat/category/accessdata/
http://www.forensicmall.ru/cat/category/belkasoft/
Криминалистика. Учебник. Коллектив авторов. – Т.: ТГЮУ. 2019. – 22 стр.
ИСО/МЭК 9594-8-94 "Информационная технология. Взаимосвязь открытых систем. Справочник. Часть 8. Основы аутентификации".
Biasiotti, Maria Angela, Jeanne Pia Mifsud Bonnici, Joe Cannataci (eds.) (2018). Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe. Springer.
Kasper, Agnes and Eneli Lauritis. (2016). Challenges in Collecting Digital Evidence: A Legal Perspective. In Tanel Kerikmae and Addi Rull. The Future of Law and eTechnologies. Springer.
Alba, Manuel. (2014). Order out of chaos: technology, intermediation, trust, and reliability as the basis for the recognition of legal effects in electronic transactions. Creighton Law Review, Vol. 47, 387-521.
Duranti, Lucciana and Corrine Rogers. (2012). Trust in digital records: an increasingly cloudy legal area.Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 28(5), 522-531.
Goode, Steven. (2009). The admissibility of electronic evidence. The Review of Litigation, Vol. 29, 1-64.
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят-процессуал кодекси. – Т. Адолат нашриёти. 2020 й. 95-модда.
https://www.unodc.org/e4j/ru/cybercrime/module-6/key-issues/digital-evidence-admissibility.html
Хамидов Б. Рақамли экспертиза натижаларини текшириш ва баҳолаш //Общество и инновации. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 3. – С. 91-97.
Albert J. Marcella, Jr. Doug Menendez. “Cyber Forensics: A Field Manual for Collecting, Examining, and Preserving Evidence of Computer Crimes”. 2nd Edition. New York, USA. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2008. – 498 p.
Anthony T.S. Ho and Shujun Li. “Handbook of digital forensics of multimedia data and devices”. Guildford, UK. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2015. – 688 p.
Richard Boddington. “Practical Digital Forensics”. Birmingham, UK. Packt Publishing Ltd., 2016. – 372 p.
Andre Arnes. “Digital Forensics”. Hoboken, Norway. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2018. – 366 p.
Joakim Kävrestad. “Fundamentals of Digital Forensics”. Skövde, Sweden. Springer International Publishing, 2018. – 227 p.
Фаткуллин Ф.Н. Общие проблему процессуального доказўвания. Казань, 1973. С.150
Andre Arnes. Digital Forensics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, USA 2018 – pp. 68-69
Vassil Roussev. Digital Forensic Science: Issues, Methods, and Challenges. – Morgan & Claypool Publishers series. University of Texas, San Antonio. 2016. – P. 10
Goodstein, D. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed., National Academies Press, 2011, ch. The Admissibility of Expert Testimony, pp. 37–54.
SWGDE Overview of the Accreditation Process for Digital and Multimedia Forensic Labs, 2017
Antwi-Boasiako and Venter, 2017; US National Institute of Justice, 2004.
Б.Х. Хамидов. Кибержиноятларни тергов қилишда эксперт кўрсатувларини текшириш ва баҳолаш. International conference science and education/uluslararasi konferans bilim ve eğitim. 2021. http://doi.org/10.37057/T_1 (155-158).
Хамидов Б. Рақамли экспертиза натижаларини текшириш ва баҳолаш //Общество и инновации. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 3. – С. 91-97.
Khamidov B. (2021). GENERAL-THEORETICAL ISSUES RELATED TO DIGITAL EVIDENCE: PROBLEM AND SOLUTION. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, (63-2), 8-16. doi: 10.24412/3453-9875-2021-63-2-8-16
https://webstore.iec.ch/preview/info_isoiec27043%7Bed1.0%7Den.pdf
Suyunova, D., & Shamsutdinov, B. (2021). Digitalization of Criminal Proceedings in the Context of the Coronavirus Pandemic (Covid-19) in Uzbekistan. Medico Legal Update, 21(2), 455-459.
Downloads
369 279Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Истам Астанов , Бахтиёржон Хамидов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
