DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss2/S-pp19-24Keywords
state budget , parliament , control , parliamentary inquiry , deputy , committee , report , budget processAbstract
The article analyzes the theoretical and legislative foundations of parliamentary consideration of budget execution reports. In particular, if in some sources it is indicated as a type of control over the execution of laws, then in other sources it is analyzed as the legislative activity of the parliament. The experience of developed countries with CIS countries is also described. In the CIS member countries, including Uzbekistan, it is analyzed that the reports on the state budget submitted to the parliament are similar to ordinary informational letters and do not have any legal consequences. It is analyzed that in the USA, Canada, EU countries, assessing the execution of the state budget as sufficiently effective, the government may announce a warning, stop financing any of its projects in the USA and the UK, make changes to the main parameters of the state budget of the USA, Brazil, Japan. In turn, problems related to this process have been identified in our country.
Downloads
References
М.С.Савченко, А.В.Дарда. Парламентский контроль. Учебное пособие. Краснодар. КубГАУ.2016.22-24Б.
Княгинин Д.К.К вопросу о понятии публичной подотчётности// Конституционное и муниципальное право.2008.№13.11Б.
Дзидзоев Р. М. Институт ежегодных отчетов Правительства РФ о результатах своей деятельности и вопросы парламентской ответственности Правительства // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2009. 21-сон.26 Б.
Конституционное (государственное) право зарубежных стран. Умумий қисм: Олий таълич муассасалари учун дарслик/Масъул муҳаррир Б.А.Страшун.М.,2005. 267-268 Б.
Downloads
128 97Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Сардорбек Юсупов, Хилал Лале Айхан Измирли

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











