DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss4-pp262-273Keywords
court , judiciary , judge , justice , abuse , electronic proceeding , transparency , openness , court orderAbstract
The article analyzes main problems of increasing the independence and fairness of the courts in Uzbekistan, explores main aspects of eradicating the abuse of judges, including problematic issues of bringing judges to criminal responsibility. Some measures of the state in increasing the openness and transparency of the court, in particular in the field of informatization and introduction of “electronic production”, which have not been brought to their logical conclusion, are highlighted. In addition, main shortcomings and gaps in organization of the work of judges, including regarding the role of chairman of the court, reducing excessive workload of judges in order of improving the quality of work and responsible approach of judges to make a lawful, fair and objective decision, are studied, the author’s conclusions and recommendations are presented.
Downloads
References
https://stat.sud.uz/index.html
https://news.un.org/ru/story/2020/07/1381961
https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/research-and-data/wjp-rule-law-index-2021
https://lex.uz/uz/docs/3162142
https://www.uni-potsdam.de/fileadmin/projects/ls-hellmann/Forschungsstelle_ Russisches_Recht/Neuauflag_der_kommentierten_StGB-%C3%9Cbersetzung_von Pavel Golovnenkov.pdf
Canivet, Guy et Joly-Hurard, Julie. La responsabilité des juges, ici et ailleurs. Revue internationale de droit comparé - 2006, №4. p. 151.
Фоков А.П. Дисциплинарная ответственность судьи в США и России: общее и особенное // Международное публичное и частное право. 2017. N 2. С. 45 - 47.
Hocquet-Berg, Sophie. La responsabilité du magistrat. Rapport français (provisoire)/ http://grerca.univ-rennes1 .fr/digitalAssets/317/ 317G22_Theme1_France_S-HOCQUET-BERG.pdf / - Groupe de recherche européen sur la responsabilité civile et les assurances
Legge 27 febbraio 2G15, n. 18 Disciplina della responsabilita' civile dei magistrati. (15GGGG34) (GU n.52 del 4-3-2G15) http://www.normattiva.it/
А.А. Кондрашев. Проблемы реализации принципа независимости судей в России: от теории к правоприменительной практике // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-realizatsii-printsipa-nezavisimosti-sudey-v-rossii-ot-teorii-k-pravoprimenitelnoy-praktike
https://racurs.ua/757-zarubejnyy-opyt-metody-ocenki-effektivnosti-raboty-sudov-v-ssha.html
И.Кудрявцев. Международные нормы и национальное законодательство обеспечения независимости судебной системы Республики Узбекистан // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhdunarodnye-normy-i-natsionalnoe-zakonodatelstvo-obespecheniya-nezavisimosti-sudebnoy-sistemy-respubliki-uzbekistan.
Комкова Г.Н., Кулушева М.А. Конституционно-правовые основы участия граждан Российской Федерации в отправлении правосудия. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 2006. С. 35.
https://www.venice.coe.int/images/SITE%20IMAGES/Publications/CApublication.pdf
https://wiki5.ru/wiki/Judicial_Conference_of_the_United_States;https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ osoben nosti-sudebnoy-sistemy-ssha
Downloads
293 172Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Абдулазиз Расулев, Баходир Исмаилов, Отабек Тошев (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
