DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss11/S-pp1-15Keywords
forensic prevention , anti-corruption procedure , pre-trial investigation , legislation , offenseAbstract
The purpose of the article is to identify the existing opportunities and real practice of law enforcement of norms on investigative prevention, the practical significance of this institution, and its potential. In the course of the study, theoretical materials on forensic prevention, legislative norms, and law enforcement practice were studied. At the same time, it was revealed that, in general, the existing regulatory regulation is insufficient for the full practical realization of the potential of investigative prevention. The exception is specialized prevention, assigned as one of the main tasks to the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Combating Corruption. Proposals are formulated to improve anti-corruption investigative prevention in other bodies of pre-trial investigation, taking into account the identified risks. The uniqueness of the situation lies in the fact that the existence of the institute of investigative prevention is, in fact, limited to the post-Soviet space. The elimination of formalism in the approach to this method of crime prevention can contribute to a more effective fight against crime, including corruption crime.
Downloads
References
Amini, C., Douarin, E., Hinks, T. 2021. Individualism and attitudes towards reporting corruption: Evidence from post-communist economies. https://cutt.ly/6WHt5EO.
Anders, G., Kanyongolo, F.E., Seim, B. 2020. Corruption and the impact of law enforcement: Insights from a mixed-methods study in Malawi. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 58(3), 315-336.
Bektenova, A. 2021. Theft pandemic. https://turanpress.kz/ekonomika/pandemiya-vorovstva-2.
Belyaeva, I.M., Kusainova, A.K., Nurgaliev, B.M. 2020. The role of statistical and rating indicators in the fight against corruption (on the example of the Republic of Kazakhstan). Bulletin of the South Ural State University, 20(3), 13-20.
Criminal procedure code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2014. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852#pos=235;-44.
Grishin, D.A. 2020. Crime prevention. Differentiation of the terminology used. Law and Right, 3, 91-94.
Ignatiev, M.E. 2019. Forensic task of investigation – establishing the causes and conditions conducive to the commission of a crime. Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University, 44(3), 467-473.
Katayev, N.A., Moldabaev, S.S., Begaliyev, B.A., Aubakirova, A.A., Begaliyev, Ye.N. 2018. The Essence and Principles of Combating Corruption in the Field of Public Procurement. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, IX(8(38)), 2631-2637. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v9.8(38).12
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 271-IV “On the prevention of offenses”. 2010. https://cutt.ly/XWHaA3m.
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 410-V “On combating corruption”. 2015. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33478302.
Lee-Jones, K. 2018. Best practices in addressing police-related corruption. https://www.u4.no/publications/best-practices-in-addressing-police-related-corruption.
Mandzhieva, E.V. 2020. Classification of measures of procedural coercion: From the “mixed” criterion to the connection with the object of security. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 15(3), 154-165.
Nagoeva, M.A. 2015. Preventive activity of the investigator. Journal of Russian Law, 2, 42-48.
National report of the Republic of Kazakhstan on anti-corruption for 2020. 2021. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/bko-zher/documents/details/34865?lang=ru.
Order of the Minister of internal affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 220 “On approval of the Instruction on the organization of the activities of the investigation, inquiry and military investigation units of the internal affairs bodies of the Republic of Kazakhstan”. 2015. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010761.
Pechegin, D.A. 2017. Investigative beginning of criminal proceedings. Journal of Russian Law, 5, 110-119.
Perov, S.N. 2016. Prevention, disclosure and investigation of corruption offenses. https://www.zakon.kz/4809204-profilaktika-raskrytie-i-rassledovanie.html.
Politiko, O.E., Zhizhileva, A.A. 2020. Problems and prospects for improving the preventive activities of the bodies of preliminary investigation. Law: Retrospective and Perspective, 1(1), 80-85.
Regulations on the Anti-Corruption Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Anti-Corruption service). 2019. https://cutt.ly/1WKuUJ2.
Sarsenov, A.M. 2010. Monitoring of international documents adopted by the United Nations in the field of combating corruption. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(20), 104-108.
Serious fraud office. 2021. https://sfo.govt.nz/.
Transparency International. 2021. https://www.transparency.org/en.
Turgumbaev, E.Z. 2010. Experience of combating corruption in the internal affairs bodies of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2(6), 144-149.
United Nations Convention against Corruption. 2003. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/uncac.html.
Voronin, S.E. 2020. Forensic prevention and tactical investigation operation. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University, 452, 229-232.
Zhursimbaev, S. 2019. Corruption of high officials is the main threat to the national security of Kazakhstan. https://www.zakon.kz/4961498-korrumpirovannost-vysokih-chinovnikov.html.
Downloads
129 111Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Мадина Касимова (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











