Characteristics of the legal status and authorities of collective copyright management organizations, their civil-legal analysis

  • PhD (Doctor of Philosophy), Associate Professor, Department of Intellectual property law, Tashkent State University of Law

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss6-pp108-121

Keywords

copyright , to enforce copyright , royalty , copyright and related rights collective management , public performance or display of a work , objects of copyright and related rights, extended collective management

Abstract

The strengthening and development of intellectual property market, as well as difficulty of individual protection and management of the author's property rights, created the need for organizations that manage the authors' property rights on a collective basis and led to their emergence. In recent years, a number of reforms have been implemented worldwide to ensure the protection of intellectual property, in particular copyright, and to strengthen its protection. These reforms are related to issues such as ensuring the rights and legal interests of authors, putting an end to the unauthorized use of copyrighted works, fair payment of copyrights and strengthening accountability measures for copyright violations. In addition, the large number of cases of unauthorized use of author's works and non-fair payment of copyright to authors indicate the growing need to develop the institution of collective management of author's property rights. In our country, there are a number of issues that are waiting for their solution, and the regulation of copyright-legal relations, in particular, collective management of copyrights in its protection, and the research of the processes related to the copyright contract are urgent tasks. In addition, the article focuses on some current problems related to the improvement of this institution, international standards of copyright protection, and comparative legal analysis of national legislation, as well as the opinions of scientists from Uzbekistan and other countries. Proposals and recommendations of scientific and practical importance for the development of copyright were put forward.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Муаллифлик ҳуқуқи ва турдош ҳуқуқлар тўғрисида”ги қонун/ https://www.lex.uz/acts/1022944

Муаллифлик ҳуқуқи ва турдош ҳуқуқларни жамоавий бошқариш. WIPO. Женева, 1990 йил, 97-бет.

Звегинцева Е., Крюков М., Шульгин А. Общество и правообладатели: проблемы в правоотношениях //Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право. 2000. N1.0. 46¬50.

Муаллифлик ҳуқуқи ва турдош ҳуқуқларни жамоавий бошқариш. WIPO. Женева, 1990. Б.83.

Ўзбекистон Республикаси Фуқаролик кодекси. Қонунчилик маълумотлари миллий базаси, 21.04.2021 й., 03/21/683/0375-сон, 12.10.2021 й., 03/21/721/0952-сон; 30.03.2022 й., 03/22/760/0249-сон

Невзгодина Е.Л. Представительство по советскому гражданскому праву. Томск, 1980. С. 31.

Рясенцев В.А. Понятие и юридическая природа полномочия представителя в гражданском праве. / Всесоюзный юридический заочный институт. – М., 1948. Б. 7.

Красавчиков O.A. Гражданские организационно-правовые отношения. Советское государство и право. 1996. № 10. С. 56-57.

Невзгодина Е.Л. Представительство по советскому гражданскому праву. Томск, 1980. С. 18.

Yakubov O. Significance And Principles Of The Trips Agreement In The Legal System Of World Trade Organization Agreements //The Peerian Journal. – 2022. – Т. 9. – С. 65-69.

Yakubov O. TRADE ORGANIZATION AGREEMENTS: THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF TRIPS AGREEMENT //Conferencea. – 2022. – С. 119-123.

Ўзбекистон Республикасининг «Муаллифлик ҳуқуқи ва турдош ҳуқуқлар тўғрисида»ги қонуни// Ўзбекистон Республикаси қонун ҳужжатлари тўплами. 2013 й., 1-сон, 1-модда, 41-сон, 543-модда.

Yakubova I.B. O’zbekistonda mualliflik huquqi bo’yicha mulkiy huquqlarni jamoaviy boshqaruv tashkilotlarining vujudga kelishi va rivojlanishi. [Emergence and development of organizations of collective management of copyright property rights in Uzbekistan]. Yurisprudensiya – Jurisprudence, 2021. No. 6. pp. 66-74.

Агарков М.М. Ценность частного права // «Правоведение». 1992. N 1. С. 37-41.

Cisac. Decisions, discussion and wishes made during congresses and assemblies, 1926—1952 гг. (CISAC 1926—1952: 328).

Якубова И. Б. Право на жизнь-неотъемлемая часть личного неимущественного права //Вопросы современной юриспруденции. –2016. –No. 12 (62).

И.Якубова. Понимание коллективного управления авторских прав в историческом контексте. Юрист Ахборотномаси 1 (6), 76-80. 12. V.Vaynke. Avtorskoe pravo. Reglamentasiya, osnovi, budushee [Copyright. Regulations, fundamentals, future.]. Denmark, M., 1979, p. 97.

O. Oqyulov. Intellektual mulkning huquqiy maqomi. [Legal status of intellectual property]. Tashkent, 2000, pp. 36-45.

Закон № 9.610 от 19.02.1998 г. «Об авторском праве и смежных правах» с изменениями, внесенными Законом № 12.853 от 14.08.2013 г. https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/legislation/details/17474

Закон Китайской Народной Республики «Об авторском праве» (обнародован Указом Президента Китайской Народной Республики № 31 от 07.09.1990 г. ) https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/legislation/details/839

Мексика: Федеральный закон об авторском праве (в редакции от 14 июля 2014 г.) https://www.wipo.int/news/ru/wipolex/2014/article_0017.html

Липцик Д. Авторское право и смежные права. М., 2002. С. 360.

Downloads

190 148

Published

Characteristics of the legal status and authorities of collective copyright management organizations, their civil-legal analysis

How to Cite

Yakubova , I. (2022). Characteristics of the legal status and authorities of collective copyright management organizations, their civil-legal analysis. Society and Innovation, 3(6), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss6-pp108-121