Konstitutsiyaviy shikoyat institutining xalqaro va milliy tajriba asosida tahlili

Noila Nurmamatova

doi:10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss2/S-pp1-6

Noila Nurmamatova PhD Student, Tashkent State University of Law

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss2/S-pp1-6

Keywords

constitutional complaint , German experience , Austrian model , procedural time limits , individual necessity , Venice Commission

Abstract

This article highlights the significance of the constitutional complaint institution and its role in resolving legal issues for citizens and organizations. Additionally, it analyzes the legal basis, criteria, and procedural requirements for accepting constitutional complaints based on the experiences of Uzbekistan, Germany, and Austria. The article emphasizes that in the German model, the principle of "individualized necessity" is of primary importance, while the Austrian experience requires applicants to provide evidence proving the legal impact of their complaint. Furthermore, the article compares the establishment of procedural deadlines and their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the judicial system with the principles of the Venice Commission. Through a comparative approach, certain shortcomings in Uzbekistan's experience are identified, and proposals for improving procedural deadlines are presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Saidov, A. (2019). Inson huquqlarini himoya qilishda konstitutsiyaviy shikoyat institutining o‘rni. Huquq va burch jurnali, 3(2), 22-30. URL:https://www.uzbekistan.org.ua/

Bekov, I. (2020). Konstitutsiyaviy shikoyat instituti: nazariya va amaliyot. Yurisprudensiya jurnali, 2(1), 33-42 URL:https://tsul.uz/

Grimm, D. (2020). The Role of Fundamental Rights After Sixty-Five Years of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Germany. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1), 9–29. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov005

Jabloner, C. (1998). Kelsen and His Circle: The Viennese Years. European Journal of International Law, 9(2), 368–374. URL: https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/9/2/368/446316

Feld, L. P., & Wieland, V. (2021). The German Federal Constitutional Court Ruling and the European Central Bank’s Strategy. Journal of Financial Regulation, 7(2), 217–253. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjab006

Visser, M. D. (2015). Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. URL: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/constitutional-review-in-europe-9781782252450/

Jabloner, C. (1998). Kelsen and His Circle: The Viennese Years. European Journal of International Law, 9(2), 368–374.

Venice Commission. (2021). *Checklist for Constitutional Justice*. Council of Europe. URL: https://www.venice.coe.int

Grimm, D. (2020). The Role of Fundamental Rights After Sixty-Five Years of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Germany. *International Journal of Constitutional Law*, 13(1), 9–29. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov005

Sajó, A., & Uitz, R. (2017). The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198732174.001.0001

Visser, M. D. (2015). Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. URL: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/constitutional-review-in-europe-9781782252450/

Downloads

PDF (O'zbek)

26 24

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Nurmamatova, N. (2025). Analysis of the Constitutional Complaint Mechanism Based on International and National Experience . Society and Innovation, 6(2/S), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss2/S-pp1-6