DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss2-pp61-67Keywords
civil rights , European Union , Uzbekistan , mandatory protection , legislative practice , legal harmonization , enforcement mechanisms , constitutional law , human rights , legal implementationAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of mandatory methods for protecting civil rights, focusing on legislative practices in the European Union (EU) and the challenges of implementing similar measures in Uzbekistan. The research identifies core mechanisms embedded in EU legal doctrine—such as the principle of effectiveness, proportionality, and state obligations in ensuring fundamental rights—and assesses their transposability into Uzbekistan’s legal and institutional framework. The study also explores comparative jurisprudence and evaluates how binding protections can be adopted without undermining national legal sovereignty. Recommendations are made to support Uzbekistan’s efforts in aligning its civil rights protection system with international standards.
Downloads
References
Craig, P., & de Búrca, G. (2020). EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Dicey, A. V. (1885). An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Macmillan.
Bekmuradov, K. (2021). “Human Rights in Uzbekistan: Between Constitutional Proclamation and Practical Realization.” Central Asia Legal Review, 3(2), 45–62.
European Union. (2000). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal C 364.
European Commission. (2018). Strengthening the Rule of Law within the Union. Brussels.
ECtHR. (2022). Annual Report of the European Court of Human Rights.
United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2019). Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Uzbekistan (CCPR/C/UZB/CO/4).
Venice Commission. (2020). Opinion on the Legal Framework for Civil Society in Uzbekistan.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation).
Case C-26/62, Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen [1963] ECR 1.
Case C-6/64, Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585.
Case C-131/12, Google Spain v. AEPD and González [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:317.
Downloads
55 18Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Сохиба Иноятова (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











