• Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss4/S-pp80-87

Keywords

unfair competition , brand dilution , comparative advertising , business reputation

Abstract

This article examines the legal challenges of protecting exclusive trademark rights in the context of advertising. The purpose of the research is to analyze how trademark law and advertising law interact to balance the exclusive rights of trademark owners with the needs of advertisers to reference others’ brands. The study uses a comparative legal method, reviewing legislation and cases from multiple jurisdictions (including Uzbekistan, the European Union, and the United States) to identify common approaches and differences. The results demonstrate that unauthorized use of another’s trademark in advertising can lead to consumer confusion and dilution of the brand’s reputation, thereby infringing the trademark owner’s exclusive rights. At the same time, many legal systems permit comparative advertising and other nominative uses of trademarks under certain conditions, recognizing that truthful, non-misleading comparisons can benefit consumers and competition. Key findings indicate that modern laws – such as those in the EU and US – provide clear criteria distinguishing lawful comparative advertising from trademark infringement​. However, the enforcement of these rules remains a challenge: even where laws are adequate, lack of awareness and weak enforcement mechanisms can undermine the protection of trademark rights in advertising. The conclusions drawn from this research underscore the need for a balanced approach. It is recommended that jurisdictions like Uzbekistan implement international best practices by clarifying the boundaries of permissible brand use in ads (for example, use of competitors’ marks is allowed for objectively substantiated comparisons or to indicate genuine products and spare parts) while strengthening measures against deceptive and unfair advertising. By improving legal provisions, increasing accountability for violators, and fostering a culture of fair competition, it is possible to ensure effective protection of trademarks in advertising without stifling legitimate comparative advertising.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Directive 2006/114/EC. (2006). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising. Official Journal of the EU, L 376, 21–27.

Grigoriadis, L. G. (2014). Comparing the Trademark Protections in Comparative and Keyword Advertising in the United States and European Union. California Western International Law Journal, 44(2), 149–205.

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Advertising. (2019). Закон Республики Узбекистан «О рекламе» (№ ZRU-560 от 26.12.2019). [Law of Uzbekistan on Advertising, in Russian].

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Trademarks, Service Marks and Appellations of Origin of Goods. (2001). Закон Республики Узбекистан «О товарных знаках, знаках обслуживания и наименованиях мест происхождения товаров» (№ 352-II от 30.08.2001, с изм. 2021). [Law of Uzbekistan on Trademarks, in Russian].

Lott, L. J. (2018). Intellectual Property Issues in Comparative Advertising. White Paper, Lott & Fischer, P.L. (Miami).

McCarthy, J. T. (2017). McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition (5th ed.). Thomson Reuters.

Paris Convention. (1883). Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (20 March 1883, as revised at Stockholm on 14 July 1967).

WTO. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), 15 April 1994, Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.

Downloads

63 85

Published

Problems of protecting exclusive trademark rights in advertising

How to Cite

Gofurova , Z. (2025). Problems of protecting exclusive trademark rights in advertising. Society and Innovation, 6(4/S), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss4/S-pp80-87