DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol4-iss5-pp118-123Keywords
functional literacy , primary education , pedagogical issues , teacher training , educational technologies , professional competence , reflection , portfolio technology , metacognitive activity , practice-oriented education , improving education quality , innovative approach , problem-based learning , assessment criteria , critical thinking , educational content , didactic tools , new pedagogical technologiesAbstract
This article scientifically analyzes the formation of functional literacy in primary education as a crucial pedagogical issue. It substantiates the need to implement modern educational technologies, develop professional competence, and strengthen reflective approaches in teacher training processes. The article reveals mechanisms for guiding students towards independent thinking and critical analysis through portfolio technology, metacognitive activities, and practice-oriented learning. Innovative approaches, problem-based teaching methods, and clear assessment criteria are recognized as key factors in enhancing educational quality. Furthermore, it outlines ways to effectively implement new pedagogical technologies by modernizing educational content and didactic tools. The article also includes methodological recommendations for developing functional literacy in the professional preparation of primary school teachers.
Downloads
References
Alexander, R. (2012). Improving oracy and classroom talk in English schools: Achievements and challenges. University of Cambridge.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
MCEETYA. (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. https://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_*-resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf
OECD. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/-BF00117714
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. ttps://doi.org/10.17763/-haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Tan, O. S., Chua, P. M. H., & Kang, T. W. (2017). Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and practices. Prentice Hall.
Abdulayev, M. X. (2021). Funktsional savodxonlik — pedagogik kategoriya sifatida. Pedagogik ta’lim va fan, (6), 37–40.
Qodirov, Z. (2020). Boshlang‘ich sinf o‘quvchilarida funksional savodxonlikni rivojlantirish yo‘llari. Ta’lim va taraqqiyot, 2(1), 56–63.
G‘afforov, I. (2022). Reflektiv yondashuv orqali pedagogik malaka shakllantirish. Pedagogika va psixologiya muammolari, 3(1), 22–27.
UNESCO. (2018). Global competence for sustainable development: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/
Downloads
14 6Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Махфуза Гофурова (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
