Yozish mahorati metodikasini sharh qilish qoidalari

Odina  Baxridinova; Qahramon  Hakimov

doi:10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss6/S-pp67-71

Odina Baxridinova talaba, Samarqand davlat chet tillar instituti, Samarqand, O'zbekiston
Qahramon Hakimov Ilmiy rahbar, o'qituvchi, Samarqand davlat chet tillar instituti, Samarqand, O’zbekiston

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss6/S-pp67-71

Kalit so‘zlar

ko'rib chiqish , fikr-mulohaza , ko'rib chiqish qoidalari , tadqiqot , yozish mahorati

Annotasiya

Ushbu maqola yozuv metodologiyasini ko'rib chiqish qoidalarining tavsifiga asoslanib, nasrda yozishda qo'llaniladigan ba'zi bir asosiy usullarni taklif etilgan. Yuqoridagi qoidalar orqali samarali tekshirishni tashkil qilish tavsiya etilgan.

Ko'chirildi

Kuchirilganligi haqida ma'lumot yuk.

Bibliografik manbalar

Rapple C (2011) The role of the critical review article in alleviating information overload. Annual Reviews White Paper. Available: http://www.annualreviews.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1300384004941/Annual_Reviews_WhitePaper_Web_2011.pdf. Accessed May 2013.

Pautasso M (2010) Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases. Scientometrics 85: 193–202

Erren TC, Cullen P, Erren M (2009) How to surf today's information tsunami: on the craft of effective reading. Med Hypotheses 73: 278–279

Hampton SE, Parker JN (2011) Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. Bioscience 61: 900–910

Ketcham CM, Crawford JM (2007) The impact of review articles. Lab Invest 87: 1174–1185

Boote DN, Beile P (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ Res 34: 3–15

Budgen D, Brereton P (2006) Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Proc 28th Int Conf Software Engineering, ACM New York, NY, USA, pp. 1051–1052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500.

Maier HR (2013) What constitutes a good literature review and why does its quality matter? Environ Model Softw 43: 3–4

Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2: 238–247

Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL (2011) Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews. Acad Med 86: 1049–1054

Torraco RJ (2005) Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Human Res Develop Rev 4: 356–367

Khoo CSG, Na JC, Jaidka K (2011) Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews. Online Info Rev 35: 255–271

Rosenfeld RM (1996) How to systematically review the medical literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 53–63

Cook DA, West CP (2012) Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Med Educ 46: 943–952

Dijkers M (2009) The Task Force on Systematic Reviews and Guidelines (2009) The value of “traditional” reviews in the era of systematic reviewing. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88: 423–430

Eco U (1977) Come si fa una tesi di laurea. Milan: Bompiani.

Hart C (1998) Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. London: SAGE.

Yuklashlar

180 155

Nashr qilingan

2021-07-15

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Baxridinova , O. ., & Hakimov , Q. . (2021). Yozish mahorati metodikasini sharh qilish qoidalari. Jamiyat Va Innovatsiyalar, 2(6/S), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss6/S-pp67-71