DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss3-pp98-108Kalit so‘zlar
шикоят , протест , суд , судгача бўлган органлар , жиноят процесси , шахс ҳуқуқлариAnnotasiya
Жиноят содир этишда шахс ҳуқуқларини таъминлаш жараёни, хусусан ушбу институтнинг таркибий қисмлари илмий тадқиқотнинг жуда долзарб мавзуси хисобланади. Ушбу институтнинг муҳим элементларидан бири жиноят процесси иштирокчилари ва бошқа шахслар томонидан жиноят иши доирасида судгача ва суд ишларини олиб борувчи органларнинг ҳаракатлари ва қарорларига шикоят қилиш ҳуқуқидир. Ушбу мақола доирасида ҳаракатлар ва қарорлар устидан миллий ва халқаро ҳуқуқ нуқтаи назаридан шикоят қилиш ҳуқуқи ўрганилади, хусусан, ривожланган мамлакатларнинг (Буюк Британия, АҚШ, Канада, янги Зеландия, Франция, Германия, Италия) Қонунчилик ва ҳуқуқни қўллаш амалиёти ўрганилмоқда. Фуқаролик ва сиёсий ҳуқуқлар тўғрисидаги халқаро Пактнинг нормалари ва мамлакат миллий қонунчилигида акс эттирилиши таҳлил қилинади.
Ko'chirildi
Bibliografik manbalar
Aboushanif v. Norway, Views, Human Rights Comm. 93d Sess., July 7-25, 2008, para. 7.2, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007(July 17, 2008).
Crimes Act 1961, § 385(1) (N.Z.).
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, § 675 (Can.).
Ennio Amodio, The Accusatorial System Lost and Regained: Reforming Criminal Procedure in Italy, 52 AM. J. CRIM. L. 489 (2004).,
Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 405-06 (1985) (Burger, C.J. dissenting).
Galstyan v. Armenia, App. No. 26986/03, Section III, EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: HUDOC, para. 126 (Nov. 15, 2007), http://echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc
Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 24 (1956).
Gurepka v. Ukraine, App. No. 61406/00, Section II, European court of human rights: Hudoc, paras. 59-60 (Sept. 6, 2005), http://echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc.
JOHN H. LANGBEIN, RENÉE LETTOW LERNER & BRUCE P. SMITH, HISTORY OF THE COMMON LAW: THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL INSTITUTIONS 416 (2009).
Kharkhal v. Belarus, Decision, Human Rights Comm. 91st Sess., Oct. 15-Nov. 2, 2007, para. 6.5, U.N. Doc. No. CCPR/C/91/D/1161/2003 (Oct. 31, 2007).
Kourtessis v. Minister of Nat’l Revenue, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 53, 69 (Can.).
Laaksonen v. Finland, App. No. 36321/97, Section IV, EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: HUDOC, at 3 (Sept. 7, 1999), http://echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc.
Lester B. Orfield, The Right of Appeal in Criminal Cases, 34 MICH. L. REV. 937, 938 (1936).
MANFRED NOWAK, INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME 23-24, 48 (2003).
Martinez v. Court of Appeal of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152, 165-66 (2000) (Scalia, J., concurring).
McKane v. Durston, 153 U.S. 684, 687 (1894).
Mirjan Damaska, Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure, 84 YALE L.J. 480, 490 (1974).
Nathan A. Smyth, The Limitation of the Right of Appeal in Criminal Cases, 17 HARV. L. REV. 317, 317 (1903).
Patrick David Hansen, Stacking Appellate Dissents: Due Process in the Appellate Arena, 18 VAL. U. L. REV. 141, 144 (1983).
Poulsen v. Denmark, App. No. 32092/96, Section II, EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: HUDOC, at 5 (June 29, 2000), http://echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, art. 2, Nov. 22, 1984, E.T.S. No. 117 [hereinafter Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR]
R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, para. 25 (Can.).
Richard S. Frase, France, in CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: A WORLDWIDE STUDY 201, 235 (Craig M. Bradley ed., 2d ed. 2007).
Rodriguez v. Spain, Views, Human Rights Comm. 94th Sess., Oct. 13-31, 2009, para. 2.3, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/94/D/1489/2006 (Oct. 30, 2008) (internal quotations omitted).
S. v. Shinga 2007 (2) SACR (CC) 28 para. 40 (S. Afr.)
STEFAN TRECHSEL, HUMAN RIGHTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 362 (2005) (“[I]nternational human-rights law is not concerned with the uniform and correct application of national law…”).
Vazquez v. Spain, Views, Human Rights Comm. 69th Sess., July 10-28, 2000, para. 11.1, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/69/D/701/1996 (July 20, 2000).
Welch v. The King, [1950] S.C.R. 412, 428 (Can.).
White House Statement on Signing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 28 WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1008, 1008-09 (June 5, 1992) (declaring the ratification of the ICCPR).
Международный пакт о гражданских и политических правах. Принят резолюцией 2200 А (XXI) Генеральной Ассамблеи от 16 декабря 1966 года. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pactpol.shtml.
Yuklashlar
237 128Nashr qilingan
Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak
Nashr
Bo'lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2022 Дилдора Базарова
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Worldwide.
