DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss7/S-pp122-129Kalit so‘zlar
xabar va harakat , haqiqiy bilim , hosting xizmati provayderlari , noqonuniy kontent , qarshi bildirishnomaAnnotasiya
Bugungi kunda internet nafaqat ma’lumot almashish uchun xizmat qilmoqda, balki u turli xil xizmatlarni taklif qilish vazifasini ham bajarmoqda. Hosting xizmati provayderlarini o‘z veb-saytlari orqali katta hajmdagi ma’lumotlarni taqdim etuvchi onlayn vositachilarning bir turi sifatida tasniflash mumkin. Biroq kimdir o‘z veb-saytidagi noqonuniy kontent haqida xabar bermaguncha, ular qaysi ma’lumotlar noqonuniy ekanligini bilishmaydi. Boshqacha qilib aytganda, hosting xizmati provayderlari noqonuniy kontentga qarshi choralar ko‘rish uchun "haqiqiy bilim”ga ega bo‘lishi kerak. Agar ular haqiqiy bilimga ega bo‘lmasa, ular o‘zlari joylashtirgan noqonuniy kontent uchun javobgar bo‘lmasligi kerak.
Ushbu maqola Yevropa Ittifoqida bildirishnoma va harakat tartibi qanday ishlashini tushuntiradi va uning huquqiy bazasining ba’zi asosiy masalalarini ko‘rsatadi. Birinchi bo‘limda “haqiqiy bilim”ni talqin qilishning turli usullari va uning barcha noqonuniy mazmunga nisbatan gorizontal qo‘llanilishi tahlil qilinadi. Bundan tashqari, maqolada turli xildagi noqonuniy tarkiblarga nisbatan noqonuniy kontentni qanchalik tez olib tashlash yoki o‘chirish kerakligi muhokama qilinadi. Nihoyat, ushbu protsedurani yanada shaffof va adolatli olib borish uchun Yevropa Ittifoqi qonunchiligiga kelajakdagi ba’zi islohotlar tavsiya qilinadi.
Ko'chirildi
Bibliografik manbalar
Delfi AS v Estonia [2015] Case no. 64569/09 European Court of Human Rights
Godfrey v. Demon Internet, [1999] 4 WLUK 224
L’Oreal and Others v eBay, [2011] Case C-324/09, Court of Justice of the European Union.
Zeran v. America Online, Inc [1997] 129 F.3d 327.
EC Directive on Electronic Commerce, 2000.
Irish Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000.
Table of Legislation (US).
Communications Decency Act 1996.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 1998.
F.Wang, ‘Response to Public Consultation on Procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries’ (2012), Issue 91 Intellectual Property Forum, 93-97.
G. Spindler, G. Riccio (2007) ‘Study on the liability of internet intermediaries’ (Markt/2006/09/E Service Contract ETD/2006/IM/E2/69), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2575069 (last accessed on 17 July 2021).
T. Moore and R. Clayton ‘The Impact of Incentives on Notice and Take-down’, (2008), Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Seventh Workshop on the Economics of Information Security,1-24.
M. Urban, J. Karaganis L. Schofield ‘Notice and take down in every day practice’ (2017) available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2755628& download=yes (last accessed on 24 July 2021).
J. Urban, L.Quilter ‘ Efficient Process or “Chilling Effects”? Takedown Notices Under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, (2006) Volume 22, Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal 621-693.
‘A clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries, available at https://blackboard.brunel.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/pid-1354701-dt-content-rid-6687642_1/courses/C.LX5625.A.2020-1.TRM2/Notice%20and%20Takedown% 20Consultation%202012.pdf (last accessed on 17 July 2021).
Communication staff working document ‘Online services, including e-commerce, in the Single Market’ European Commission, Brussels, 2012, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011SC1641&from=EN (last accessed on 17 July 2021).
eBay VeRo Program information, available at https://pages.ebay.com/seller-center/listing-and-marketing/verified-rights-owner-program.html (last accessed on 17 July 2021).
Yuklashlar
153 135Nashr qilingan
Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak
Nashr
Bo'lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2022 Ибрагим Саидов
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Worldwide.
