DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss1/S-pp583-591Keywords
irony , literary , category , text , diverse , humor , range , means , expression , linguistic , discourse , stylistic , device , forms , artistic , realityAbstract
This article considers irony as a substantive category associated with the worldview and aesthetics of the speakers. The correlation between stylistic and conceptual types of irony is analyzed to reveal the commonality and differences between linguistic and extralinguistic forms of irony realization, reflecting the speaker’s worldview. The nature of irony is directly dependent on the personality of the speaker: his social status, logical reasoning, aesthetic views, and ethical ideas – this is reflected in the ratio of irony, expressed only by linguistic means, and irony, expressed mainly by extralinguistic means. Particularly significant for the implementation of irony is the role of the context, which can be wide and narrow. It is the awareness of the recipient about the context that is the main condition for the communicative success of irony. We also emphasize that if the linguocultural or socio-historical contexts are not taken into account, irony also does not achieve its goal. Future teachers should develop a need to express their thoughts in the best possible way following the goals and objectives of the transmitted information, taking into account the situation of communication. Enriching the speech of students of a pedagogical university using creating humor and irony is one of the aspects of their speech development
References
Fomicheva Zh. Intertextuality as a means of embodying irony in the modern English novel: author. dis. cand. philol. Sciences. SPb., 1992.
Fomicheva Zh. E. Intertextuality as a means of embodying irony in the modern English novel: author. dis. ... cand. philol. Sciences. SPb., 1992.
Hutchean L. Irony’s edge. The theory and politics of irony. N.Y., 1994.
Kazaeva L.I. Types and functions of repetitions in texts of poetic and artistic genre // Vestn. Yugra state. university 2006. Issue. 5. P. 50–53.
Kamenskaya Yu. Irony as a component of the idiostyle of A.P. Chekhov: dis. … cand. philol. Sciences. Saratov, 2001, p. 74.
Kolshansky G. Contextual semantics. M., 1980. S. 115.
Kuznetsova A. V. Literary text in the cognitive paradigm: semantic space and conceptualization // European social science journal. Riga – Moscow, 2011. No. 5. P. 155-161.
Kuznetsova A. V. The phenomenon of bilingual artistic text: semantic-pragmatic status // Vestnik PSLU. Pyatigorsk, 2012. No. 1. S. 80-84.
Larin B. On the varieties of artistic speech. Semantic studies // Russian speech. Issue. 1. Petersburg, 1923. S. 19.
Muecke D.C. The Compass of Irony. Methuen, 1969.
Pivoev V. M. Irony as a phenomenon of culture. Petrozavodsk: Petrozav. state un-t., 2002. 106 p.
Samygina L. V. Irony as a metatextual phenomenon in the stories of S. Dovlatov. Diss. …cand. philol. n. Rostov-on-Don, 2013. 212 p. Losev A.F. Form – Style – Expression / Comp.
Orlova G. V. Means of ironic modality formation in modern journalistic discourse (review genre): Author. dis.
Orlov M. Text-forming irony in Russian and English prose: author. dis…. cand. philol. Sciences. Saratov, 2005. S. 5. Cand. philol. Sciences. SPb., 2005.
Pokhodnya S. Language means and types of implementations of irony. Kyiv, 1989. S. 97.
Sergienko A. Language possibilities for the implementation of irony as a kind of implication in literary texts: author. dis. cand. philol. Sciences. Saratov, 1995. P. 17. Stein K. Harmony of the poetic text. Stavropol, 2006. S. 578.
Shatunovsky I. Irony and its types // Logical analysis of language. Language mechanisms of comedy. M., 2007.
Turner G. Stylistics. Harmondsworth, 1975. R. 146.
Vinogradov V. On the theory of artistic speech. M., 1971. S. 203.
Weinrich H. The textual function of the French article // New in foreign linguistics. M., 1978. Issue. 8. S. 375.
