The study of the Iskandar theme in Uzbek literary scholarship

  • Doctoral student, Alisher Navo’i Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss4-pp47-56

Keywords

Alexander theme , Alexander Romance , Alisher Navoi , Saddi Iskandariy , comparative-typological analysis , folk epic , classical literature

Abstract

The Study of the Alexander Theme in Uzbek Literary Scholarship is one of the intersections of Eastern and Western literary traditions and therefore requires particular scholarly attention. The sources of the Alexander figure are closely linked to the ancient Greek “Alexander Romance”, the works of Persian classical poets such as Nizami Ganjavi, and various samples of oral folk literature. In Uzbek literary studies, this theme began to be systematically investigated in the second half of the 20th century.

Between 1991 and 2010, comparative-typological research expanded, where the image of Alexander was analyzed in comparison with epic heroes of folk literature and with Western literary traditions. Scholars such as F. Sulaymonova, B. Sarimsoqov, K. Imomov, H. Homidiy, and M. Jo‘rayev paid particular attention to similarities and differences in epic and written portrayals of Alexander, as well as to the migration of motifs and narrative structures. Furthermore, researchers like A. Hayitmetov, R. Vohidov, and H. Eshonqulov examined the role and artistic features of Alexander’s image in Alisher Navoi’s epic Saddi Iskandariy within the context of Uzbek classical literature.

In recent studies (I. Ismoilov, Sh. Khudoyberdiyeva, and others), the genetic roots, folkloric interpretations, and poetic structures of Alexander’s image are analyzed through modern comparative approaches. These investigations allow for a complex study of the Alexander theme in Uzbek literary scholarship from historical-literary, comparative-typological, and poetic perspectives.

References

Бартольд, В. В. Туркестан в эпоху монгольского нашествия. – Москва: Наука, 1963. – 600 с.

Навоий, Алишер. Садди Искандарий / МАТ. 20 т. Т. 11. – Тошкент: Фан, 1987. 727 б.

Golden, P. B. Central Asia in World History. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. – 184 p.

Бартольд, В. В. Очерк истории семейских отношений у мусульман. – Петроград, 1918. – 56 с.

Бертельс, Е. Э. Низами и его современники. – Москва: Изд-во АН СССР, 1940. – 312 с.

Смирнова, О. А. Рукописи среднеазиатских народных книг. –Москва: Изд-во восточной литературы, 1959. – 198 с.

Ҳайитметов, А. Алишер Навоий ва ўзбек адабиёти тарихи масалалари. – Тошкент: Фан, 1970. – 250 б.

Ўзбек адабиёти тарихи. – Тошкент: Ўқитувчи, 1976. – 420 б.

Воҳидов, Р.; Эшонқулов, Ҳ. Ўзбек мумтоз адабиёти тарихи. – Тошкент: Университет, 2005. – 368 б.

Meisami, J. S. Medieval Persian Historiography. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. – 320 p.

Сулаймонова, Ф. Ўзбек халқ достонларида тарихий шахс образи. – Тошкент: Фан, 1998. – 215 б.

Саримсоқов, Б. Ўзбек халқ эпосида тарихий образлар эволюцияси. – Тошкент: Ма’навият, 2001. – 184 б.

Имомов, К.; Хомидий, Ҳ. Шарқ адабиёти ва халқ оғзаки ижодида Искандар обра́зи // Ўзбек тили ва адабиёти. – 2005. – №4. – Б. 45-52.

Жўраев, М. Қиёсий адабиётшунослик асослари. – Тошкент: Ўзбекистон Миллий университети, 2007. – 276 б.

Ismoilov, I. Alisher Navoiyning “Saddi Iskandariy” dostonining qiyosiy tahlili: PhD dissertatsiyasi. – Toshkent, 2019. – 160 b.

Ismoilov, I. Alisher Navoiyning “Saddi Iskandariy” dostoni genezisi va poetikasi: DsC dissertatsiyasi. –Toshkent, 2022. – 280 b.

Худойбердиева, Ш. Искандар подшо қиссаси — Искандар ҳақидаги халқона асар // Фольклоршунослик тўплами. – Тошкент, 2023. – Б. 85-94.

Бертельс, Е. Э. Роман об Александре и его главные версии на Востоке. – Москва-Ленинград: Изд-во АН СССР, 1948. – 280 с.

Downloads

37 28

Published

The study of the Iskandar theme in Uzbek literary scholarship

How to Cite

Abduraimova, K. 2025. The study of the Iskandar theme in Uzbek literary scholarship. Foreign Linguistics and Lingvodidactics. 3, 4 (Jul. 2025), 47–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss4-pp47-56.

Issue

Section

Literary studies and linguoculturology