• Tadqiqotchi, O'zbekiston Jurnalistika va ommaviy kommunikatsiyalar Universiteti

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss2/S-pp187-196

Kalit so‘zlar

saylov , demokratiya , PR , kongress , siyosiy partiyalar

Annotasiya

Mazkur maqolada saylovlardagi PR (jamoatchilik bilan aloqalar sohasi) batafsil o‘rganildi. Ayniqsa xalqaro tajribaning o‘rganilganligi xalqaro olimlarning fikrlari va ilmiy ishlariga asoslanganligi bilan yanada ahamiyatli. Saylovlarda ham hukumat, ham siyosiy partiyalar jamoatchilik fikriga taʼsir oʻtkazish uchun turli strategiyalarni qoʻllagan holda PR texnologiyalaridan foydalanish tobora ommalashib bormoqda. Ijtimoiy media platformalari nomzodlarga kengroq auditoriyani qamrab olish va o‘z xabarlarini tarqatish imkonini beruvchi saylovoldi tashviqotida muhim rol o‘ynaydi. Biroq, hukumatning onlayn makon ustidan nazorati va saylovchilarni manipulyatsiya qilish uchun noto‘g‘ri ma’lumot tarqatish kampaniyalari ehtimoli bilan bog‘liq xavotirlar mavjud. Mazkur maqolada bu borada aniq misollar keltirilganligi, fikrlarning har biri ilmiy asosga ega ekanligi maqolaning ilmiyligini oshirgan deyishimiz mumkin.

Bibliografik manbalar

Lilleker, D. G., & Negrine, R. Professionalization: Of what? Since when?

By whom? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(4), 2002. 289-b.

Bernays, E. L. Propaganda. Horace Liveright. 1928. 140-b.

Kern, M. 30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties. Praeger. 1989. 116-b.

Druckman, J. N. The power of television images: The first Kennedy-Nixon debate revisited. Journal of Politics, 65(2), 2003. 566-b.

Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information.

Issenberg, S. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. Crown Publishing Group. 2012.

Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J., & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication: A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national elections. New Media & Society, 19(9), 1494-1511.

Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 2012. 295-298-bb.

Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. The minimal persuasive effects of campaign contact in general elections: Evidence from 49 field experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 2018. 148-166-bb.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi 31-modda: https://constitution.uz/ oz/clause/index#section7

Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Springer International Publishing. 2017. 33-b.

Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press. 2011.

McGeveran, W. Privacy and data protection law. University Casebook Series. Foundation Press. 2016. 46-49-bb.

McFarland, M. Barack Obama and the Facebook Election. U.S. News & World Report. 2009. 202-b.

Hendricks, J. A., & Denton, R. E. Communicator-in-Chief: How Barack Obama Used New Media Technology to Win the White House. Lexington Books. 2010.

Kreiss, D. Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford University Press. 2012. 321-b.

Cummings, D. On the referendum #21: Branching histories of the

referendum and ‘the frogs before the storm’. Dominic Cummings's Blog. 2017.

Yuklashlar

65 16

Nashr qilingan

Saylov jarayonlaridagi pr texnologiyalari va uning huquqiy asoslari

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Namozov, J. 2024. Saylov jarayonlaridagi pr texnologiyalari va uning huquqiy asoslari. Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika. 2, 2/S (Aug. 2024), 187–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss2/S-pp187-196.