DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss1-pp126-131Kalit so‘zlar
tilni baholash , to‘g‘rilik , ishonchlilik , amaliy qulaylik , haqiqiylik , ta’sir (washback) , raqamli ta’lim , sun’iy intellektAnnotasiya
Tilni baholash – bu til o‘qitishning muhim jihati bo‘lib, o‘quvchilarning til qobiliyatlarini aniq baholashga yordam beradi. Samarali baholash to‘g‘rilik, ishonchlilik, amaliy qulaylik, haqiqiylik va ta’sir kabi tamoyillarga asoslanadi va adolatli hamda mazmunli natijalarni ta’minlaydi. Zamonaviy ta’lim baholash jarayonida raqamli vositalar va sun’iy intellektdan foydalanishni kengaytirib, samaradorlik va fikr-mulohaza sifatini oshiradi. Har tomonlama o‘rganish tizimi an’anaviy va raqamli ta’lim hamda turli baholash usullarini o‘z ichiga oladi. Shunga qaramay, adolatli va samarali baholashni ta’minlash pedagogik hamda texnologik yondashuvlarni chuqur tushunishni talab qiladi.
Bibliografik manbalar
Bruner J.S. Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press, 1966.
Piaget J. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton, 1952.
Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning // Assessment in Education. – 1998. – № 5(1). – P. 7-74.
Harlen W., James M. Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment // Assessment in Education. – 1997. – № 4(3). – P. 365-379.
Messick S. Validity // Educational Measurement. – 1989. – № 3. – P. 13-103.
Brown J.D. Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005.
Bachman L., Palmer A. Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Widdowson H.G. Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Alderson J.C., Wall D. Does washback exist? // Applied Linguistics. – 1993. – № 14(2). – P. 115-129.
Dede C. Emerging technologies in education. Harvard University Press, 2011.
Redecker C., Johannessen Ø. Changing assessment – Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT // European Journal of Education. – 2013. – № 48(1). – P. 79-96.
Bennett R.E. Formative assessment: A critical review // Assessment in Education. – 2011. – № 18(1). – P. 5-25.
Siemens G. Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline // American Behavioral Scientist. – 2013. – № 57(10). – P. 1380-1400.
Garrison D.R., Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education // Internet and Higher Education. – 2004. – № 7(2). – P. 95-105.
Chapelle C.A. Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. – 1999. – № 19. – P. 254-272.
Fulcher G., Davidson F. Language testing and assessment. Routledge, 2007.
Hughes A. Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Weir C.J. Language testing and validation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Alderson J.C., Clapham C., Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Weir C. Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Cheng L., Watanabe Y., Curtis A. Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Routledge, 2004.
Green A. Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-sessional language courses. Assessment in Education. – 2007. – № 14(1). – P. 75-97.
Yuklashlar
60 11Nashr qilingan
Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak
Nashr
Bo'lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2025 Мунира Умарова, Розия Усмонова

Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Worldwide.











