Moral and legal principles of artificial intellect liability

  • doctor of philosophy in law, acting professor, associate professor, department of private international law, Tashkent state law university, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss3-pp48-56

Keywords

robotics , artificial intelligence , law , ethics , legal , liability , rules , intellectual property

Abstract

In this paper, the author considers modern scientific approaches to understanding artificial intelligence, including from the point of view of determining its responsibilities. As the author points out, the issue of creating artificial intelligence and determining its essence, the moral and legal principles of robotics has always been relevant in science fiction literature. In the article, the author analyzes the conditions under which the legal responsibility of artificial intelligence objects arises, recognizes this or that situation as dangerous for humans, gives examples of the relationship between robots and the priority of human life. As the main problem of the legal regulation of artificial intelligence, the author points out that they are autonomous and independent of the creators or operators of robots, which makes it very difficult to determine the measures and the subject of legal responsibility. Various approaches to the legal liability of artificial intelligence will be considered. Thus, the positions of equating artificial intelligence objects with legal entities, as well as objects with high social risk, are studied, their pros and cons are analyzed, legal and social factors, the possibility of some national and international experiments, as well as international rules of robotics (France, EU) are considered. In conclusion, in addition to the huge potential for creating artificial intelligence, there are a number of social, economic, political, technological, legal, ethical and other issues that need to be addressed in connection with its implementation in the near future. There are also philosophical problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Edmonds, Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us About Right and Wrong, Princeton University Press, 2013.

The Mechanical Mind in History, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: PP. 149–184

Asaro P. The Liability Problem for Autonomous Artificial Agents // AAAI Symposium on Ethical and Moral Considerations in Non-Human Agents, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. March 21–23, 2016, P. 191.

Arkhipov V., Naumov V. On Certain Issues Regarding the Theoretical Grounds for Developing Legislation on Robotics: Aspects of Will and Legal Personality // Zakon. 2017, No. 5, P. 167.

Asaro P. The Liability Problem for Autonomous Artificial Agents, P. 193.

Arkhipov, V., Naumov, V. – P. 164.

Winkler A. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. Liverlight, 2018. See a description here: Ошибка! Недопустимый объект гиперссылки.

Brożek B., Jakubiec M. On the Legal Responsibility of Autonomous Machines // Artificial Intelligence Law. 2017, No. 25(3), pp. 293–304.

Khanna V.S. Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve? // Harvard Law Review. 1996, No. 109, PP. 1477–1534.

Hage J. Theoretical Foundations for the Responsibility of Autonomous Agents // Artificial Intelligence Law. 2017, No. 25(3), PP. 255–271.

Downloads

213 228

Published

Moral and legal principles of artificial intellect liability

How to Cite

Bozarov, S. (2022). Moral and legal principles of artificial intellect liability. Society and Innovation, 3(3), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss3-pp48-56