DOI
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss5-pp82-92Keywords
copyright , artificial intelligence , enforce copyright , royalty , copyright and related rights collective management , public performance or display of work , objects of copyright and related rights , extended collective managementAbstract
At present, various reasons are given for introduction of artificial intelligence into the fields, of which we will mention three most important ones. The first is low-cost high-performance computing resources. The second is availability of large amounts of data for education. For an AI product to make accurate predictions, it needs to process large amounts of data. This factor led to creation of various tools, in particular, simple and inexpensive means of data storage and processing, and various algorithms. Third, artificial intelligence products strengthen competitiveness. It can offer many tools for companies to reduce costs and risks, expand market access and other beneficial factors. As a result, companies that have implemented artificial intelligence will be more resistant to competition. The problems of artificial intelligence being objects of collective management of copyrights are analyzed based on the experience of foreign countries. In addition, the article focuses on some current problems related to improvement of this institution, international standards of copyright protection and comparative legal analysis of national legislation, as well as opinions of scientists from Uzbekistan and other countries. Proposals and recommendations of scientific and practical importance for the development of copyright were put forward.
Downloads
References
Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, 306 - The Human Authorship Requirement, Chapter 300, accessible at <https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf>, accessed on 26 January 2021 at IST 0837 hrs.
Cf. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884).
Legal protection for all photographs was eventually made a part of the U.S. Copyright Act. 17 U.S.C. § 106A (2012).
Computer Software Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 96-517, § 117, 94 Stat. 3028 (1980) (codified at 17 U.S.C. § 117 (1988)).
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг «Муаллифлик ҳуқуқи ва турдош ҳуқуқлар тўғрисида»ги қонуни// Ўзбекистон Республикаси қонун ҳужжатлари тўплами. 2013 й., 1-сон, 1-модда, 41-сон, 543-модда.
World Intellectual Property Indicators, WIPO, (2019), <https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4464>, accessed on 26 January 2021 at IST 0830 hrs.
Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).
AN ACT TO AMEND AND CONSOLIDATE THE ACTS RESPECTING COPYRIGHT. https://www.copyright.gov/history/1909act.pdf
Yakubov O. Significance And Principles Of The Trips Agreement In The Legal System Of World Trade Organization Agreements //The Peerian Journal. – 2022. – Т. 9. – С. 65-69.
Zyatiskiy S. Problemi realizasii avtorskix i smejnix prav na kollektivnoy osnove v usloviyax razvitiya novix texnologiy [Problems of implementation of copyright and related rights on a collective basis in the context of the development of new technologies]. Moscow. 2003, pp. 27-38.
Gavrilov E.P. "Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti. Avtorskoe pravo i smejnie prava. XXI vek" [Intellectual property right. Copyright and related rights. XXI century] – Yurservitum, 2016, pp. 425-446.
Yakubov O. TRADE ORGANIZATION AGREEMENTS: THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF TRIPS AGREEMENT //Conferencea. – 2022. – С. 119-123.
Nasriev I.I. Muallifning shaxsiy huquqlarini himoyalash [ Protection of the non-property rights]. Tashkent, Mehnat, 2003, pp. 45-57.
Yakubova I.B. O’zbekistonda mualliflik huquqi bo’yicha mulkiy huquqlarni jamoaviy boshqaruv tashkilotlarining vujudga kelishi va rivojlanishi. [Emergence and development of organizations of collective management of copyright property rights in Uzbekistan]. Yurisprudensiya – Jurisprudence, 2021. No. 6. pp. 66-74.
Leanovich, E.B. [Problems of legal regulation of Internet relations with a foreign element] Problemi pravovogo regulirovaniya internet-otnosheniy s inostrannim elementom. Available at: http://www.evolution.info.
Якубова И. Б. Право на жизнь-неотъемлемая часть личного неимущественного права //Вопросы современной юриспруденции. –2016. –No. 12 (62).
И.Якубова. Понимание коллективного управления авторских прав в историческом контексте. Юрист Ахборотномаси 1 (6), 76-80. 12. V.Vaynke. Avtorskoe pravo. Reglamentasiya, osnovi, budushee [Copyright. Regulations, fundamentals, future.]. Denmark, M., 1979, p. 97.
O. Oqyulov. Intellektual mulkning huquqiy maqomi. [Legal status of intellectual property]. Tashkent, 2000, pp. 36-45.
Stanieri A., Zeleznikow J., Gawler M. and Lewis B, 1999 [A hybrid-neutral approach to automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia], Artificial intelligence and law, 7(2-3), pp. 127-132.
Brams, S.J. and Taylor, A.D. Fair division from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996, pp. 48-52.
Yakubova I., Yakubov A. Problems Of Copyright Protection: Plagiary And Piracy On The Internet // Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Vol.12 No. 4, pp. 1132-1135.
Downloads
172 122Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ирода Якубова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
